Need
What are people experiencing? Describe who is affected, how, and whose definition of the issue is being used.
Insights & practical resources
Understand community needs, evidence, barriers, assets and readiness before choosing a response.
By Blaise Itabelo · Updated 26 September 2026
A practical guide for discussion and planning. Adapt it to the people, purpose and authority involved; it is not a validated assessment instrument.
Use these prompts together and revisit them as you learn. They are not a fixed sequence.
What are people experiencing? Describe who is affected, how, and whose definition of the issue is being used.
What do community accounts, observations and service data tell you? Record sources, dates and gaps; distinguish evidence from assumptions.
What makes access or participation difficult? Consider language, cost, transport, timing, trust and the way a service is designed.
What knowledge, relationships, skills and resources already exist? Ask how a response can support community strengths.
What authority, capacity, relationships and resources would a response need? Check the readiness of the organisation as well as the community.
What action is proportionate to the evidence? Compare options, test feasibility and identify what must be learnt before committing.
Illustrative application
A community service notices low attendance. Instead of assuming a lack of interest, it checks session times, transport, language access and whether the offer matches community priorities. Conversations and attendance patterns may suggest changing the format before expanding the programme.
This is a hypothetical planning example, not a claim about a client engagement.
Copy these headings into your planning document. Record evidence and uncertainty, then agree who will follow up.
Before acting: check who has contributed, what is still uncertain, and who has authority to make the next decision.
These prompts bring together common engagement and planning practices. They are offered as practical working guidance, without a claim that the underlying ideas are unique.